Which of the following is a consequence of inadequate resource allocation during an AML audit?

Inadequate resource allocation during an AML (Anti-Money Laundering) audit can lead to significant legal and reputational risks for the organization. This consequence arises from the failure to properly evaluate and address potential money laundering activities, which can result in non-compliance with regulations. If an organization does not allocate sufficient resources—such as skilled personnel, technology, and financial investments—it may miss critical red flags or fail to implement necessary controls.

When compliance gaps are identified by regulators or other external entities, the organization can face severe penalties, including fines, sanctions, or increased scrutiny. Furthermore, being publicly cited for deficiencies in AML practices can damage the organization's reputation, eroding customer trust and impacting relationships with stakeholders, investors, and the market as a whole.

In contrast, the other outcomes depicted in the answer choices suggest a positive outcome, which would not result from inadequate resource allocation. These responses do not align with the implications of failing to meet regulatory standards in an AML context.